|
Citations
[01] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 50.
[02] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 50.
[03] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 58.
[04] Plato, Socrates’ Defense (Apology) 35, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 20.
[05] Plato, Theaetetus 172, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 878.
[06] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 58.
[07] Walter J. Ong, Ramus: Method, and the Decay of Dialogue, 280.
[08] Joseph 1947, 19.
[09] Paul B. Woodruff, Socrates, Academic American Encyclopedia (6 February 1996).
[10] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, xviii.
[11] Plato, Phaedrus 263, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 508.
[12] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 24.
[13] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 47.
[14] Johns C. Hodges and Mary E. Whitten, Harbrace College Handbook, 323.
[15] Kenneth W. Houp and Thomas E. Pearsall,
Reporting Technical Communication, 107.
[16] Plato, Theaetetus 202, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 909.
[17] Plato, Theaetetus 206, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 914.
[18] Plato, Theaetetus 207, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 914.
[19] Plato, Theaetetus 208, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 916.
[20] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 47.
[21] Plato, Phaedrus 263, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 508.
[22] Plato, Laws 10.895, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 1451.
[23] Plato, Meno 79, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 362.
[24] Plato, Meno 72, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 355.
[25] Plato, Theaetetus 172, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 877.
[26] Plato, Sophist 218, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 960.
[27] Plato (Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns),
Theaetetus Introduction, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 845.
[28] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 25.
[29] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 28.
[30] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 23.
[31] Plato (Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns),
Theaetetus Introduction, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 845.
[32] Kenneth W. Houp and Thomas E. Pearsall,
Reporting Technical Communication, 112.
[33] Plato, Euthyphro 6, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 174.
[34] Leonard Nelson, Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy, 19.
[35] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 48.
[36] Paul Trummel, Parallel Multivariate Media Complexes:
Codirectionality in Verbal andVisible Communication,
IPCC 92 Conference Record, 1992, 151.
[37] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 174.
[38] David Sless, Learning and Visual Communication, 164, 172, 178.
[39] C. P. Snow, The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, 1959.
[40] Wayne Brockriede, Trends in the Study of Rhetoric:
Toward a Blending of Criticism andScience, The Prospect of Rhetoric, 1971.
[41] David Sless, Learning and Visual Communication, 1173.
[42] Wayne Brockriede, Trends in the Study of Rhetoric:
Toward a Blending of Criticism andScience, The Prospect of Rhetoric, 1971.
[43] The four master tropes: metaphor, metonym, synecdoche, and irony, play a prominent role in the discovery and description of truth beyond their figurative usage. This results from dividing and shifting between figurative and literal uses that cause them to merge into anevanescent entity. For the immediate purpose, the term trope means changing the meaning or significance of words, or images. This contrasts with the practice of onlyarranging words or images into patterns.
[44] rebus principle. Graphic representation. Relates verbal/visible depiction metonymically. Applies metonymic signs and demonstrates combined verbal/visible language as rhetoricaldevices. Communicates by using both verbal and visible language attributes. Comparescongruence (correspondence) of signs with the totality of previous experience with similarshapes. Controls representation of logogrammatic and phonogrammatic symbols of wordsor phrases as signs (graphics). Relates the name of one object or concept with that ofanother. Frequently represents in visible form, objects whose names resemble in soundthat of the represented word or syllable.
[45] trope. Figurative use of a word or an expression, as metaphor or hyperbole.
[46] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 102.
[47] Wayne Brockriede, Trends in the Study of Rhetoric:
Toward a Blending of Criticism andScience, The Prospect of Rhetoric, 1971.
[48] David Sless, Learning and Visual Communication, 173.
[49] David Sless, Learning and Visual Communication, 20.
[50] Rhys W. Roberts and Ingram Bywater (trans),
The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle, 1984.
[51] Chaim Perelman, The New Rhetoric,
The Prospect of Rhetoric (Lloyd F. Bitzer and EdwinBlack), 1971.
[52] Plato, Theaetetus 202, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 909.
[53] Plato, Theaetetus 206, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, 914.
[54] Richard A. Lanham,
A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 154, 155, 157.
[55] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 503.
[56] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 503, 504.
[57] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 506, 507.
[58] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 101.
[59] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 503, 507.
[60] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 507, 508.
[61] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 148.
[62] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 507.
[63] Richard A. Lanham, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Second Edition), 148.
[64] Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives, 503, 516.
[65] Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory, 98, 99, 166.
|
