Outing (exposing) queers only comes into play when the need arises to warn potential victims that they have used violence and sexual proclivity to influence or intimidate people with different religious or moral views than their own. This works the same way for heterosexual people. People who have a sexual preference different from other people may not use that sexual proclivity as an excuse for violent behavior then avoid repercussion by claiming discrimination against a minority group.
Research has shown that much queer male violence stems from a need to establish a masculinity to overcome the stereotypic world-view of effeminacy. It also results from fear of bigoted people like Felippe Jacques (Council House sadist) who wrote that he has a taste for violence and inflicting pain.
He wrote that:
He has “always enjoyed [h]itting the shit out [of] gays and assorted low lifers”.
Paradoxically, Judge Doerty, allegedly queer, unquestioningly based all his findings in the Council House case upon the perjury of Felippe Jacques, a self-proclaimed, homophobic bigot and the people that he suborned. Perhaps their respective Irish and French psychological or emotional inhibitions caused them more distress than queerness and homophobia judging by the brutal way in which they have jointly and severally persecuted an English journalist. Has history not shown them that they cannot prevail? [Noblesse Oblige]
Council House queers, while constitutionally entitled to protect themselves from discrimination and hate speech, must not take out their frustration on hetrosexuals. Oxymoronically, Stephen A. Mitchell, Council House administrator chose Felippe Jacques as his principal confederate in establishing a reign of terror - strange bedfellows. [Strange Bedfellows]
The English term “queer” does not pejoratively describe homosexuals. It describes a state of being different from, but not necessarily in opposition to, a societal norm. In America, homosexual men and women who wish to think of themselves in oppositional terms frequently choose to call themselves queer. This has now expanded to include transgendered and bisexual people and has become part of common language usage in the United States. 
Judge Doerty (elected judge partly through the financial and political support of a Seattle gay rights group) denounced this author in court as homophobic without a shred of evidence to support the accusation. Doerty then called him a misogynist without giving him any credit for all the lesbians he has rehabilitated during a lifetime of service to minorities. Later that day, Doerty made his ad hominem remarks part of the court record and published them on the web without allowing refutation.
Doerty’s comments probably reflect his own bigotry and self-hate. He has variously made unsubstantiated charges of homophobia, misogynism, meanness, anti-Semitism, and racism. He used professional and academic character assassination without any foundation whatsoever to characterize this reporter as a poseur. His harassing statements will probably support charges of gross judicial misconduct that will involve the Seattle media for printing his libel.
The judicial cannons specifically proscribe such behavior:
1. Judges shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
2. Judges should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all their activities.
3. Judges shall perform the duties of their office impartially and diligently.
4. Judges may engage in activities to improve the law, the legal system and the administration of justice.
5. Judges shall regulate their extrajudicial activities to minimize the risk of conflict with their judicial duties.
6. Judges shall regularly file reports of compensation received for quasi-judicial and extra-judicial activities.
7. Judges shall refrain from political activity inappropriate to their judicial office. 
Doerty should consult with his Council House pimp, Judge Wartnik, before he makes any more unfounded accusations and leaves both of them open to more charges of judicial misconduct.
Rebecca Harding Davis characterized Walt Whitman as indecent on similar grounds to those prevalent with the anal obsession of both Doerty and Felippe Jacques (Marquis de Sade) - judged by many as coarse by nature and vulgar breeding. Davis would by Doerty JudicialSpeak rank as another bogus freelance journalist and poseur. She would have learned in his court that she served no useful journalistic purpose because she did not work for an established publishing house.
Both Doerty and Wartnik rank with Walt Whitman for hubris. Whitman considered the light burning within him divine although he had a cheap and nasty lamp. He ranked from first to last, as a boorish, awkward poseur that flourished by the adulation of his devotees.
According to campaign disclosure records and analogous to the adulation of Walt Whitman, Doerty received campaign contributions from a stream of gay men. A gay rights celebration also helped fill his election coffers. Doerty apparently has devotees among the Seattle queer community, however, instead of making pilgrimages to his house as a shrine they hold parades in his honor. The females flap their breasts into a cool breeze and lay money at his altar while offering prayers for his election and paroxysmal laughter at his erection.
When Whitman died, his sycophants paid homage to his memory as the "most eminent citizen of the Republic." They summoned shades of Confucius, Buddha, and the Savior at his grave to welcome their peer into the heavens. Will Confucius, Buddha, and the Savior welcome this queer judge into the heavens or will public disenchantment let him aspire to a warmer clime?
Whitman adulation had an equally disenchanted public that portrayed him as a devil and denied him any spark of divine fire. The poems that his disciples regarded as immortal treasures his dissenters described as "dunghill heaps of filth and corruption", something like Doerty’s legal opinions. Davis wrote:
They held the man himself to have been a monster of vice. He was discharged from the service of the government, when a member of the Cabinet read his poems, as promptly as a beast of prey would be driven out of a village sewing circle, and by special edict the poems were forbidden circulation in the mails.
Surely a cool posterity will acknowledge that this huge, uncouth fellow had the eye and tongue of the seer. To him, as to Dante and the oracle, it was given sometimes to be spokesman for the gods, to talk of death and life, in words not unworthy of their themes. 
One could ask how Doerty survives on a salary of about $100,000/year without similar largesse. Whitman, lazed in a comfortable house provided for him by charity and accepted hard-earned money from poor young men. Meanwhile, he had thousands of dollars hoarded that he spent on building a tawdry monument to himself - shades of Council House directors.
Davis would also have discovered from Doerty that she “merely [had] the misguided use of an obviously well-developed talent to write”. She certainly did a competent job on Walt Whitman. Regretfully, she died in 1910 before she could produce a similar literary work about James A. Doerty. She left it to other "poseurs" to continue her admirable work on that score.
Previously, Felippe Jacques coerced more than forty residents to perjure themselves by signing false declarations for submission to Judge Doerty. Doerty accepted them without question and has acted upon them with prejudice. Moreover, he denied the target of those declarations, an opportunity to defend himself. Council House attorney Richard Du Bey (SCaB - Seattle) coordinated that frame-up with his then assistant Maureen L. Mitchell (Attorney-at-Law, Summit Law Group, Seattle) who bears the Doerty-approved pseudonym “Minnie Mouse”. They will probably both eventually have to respond to complaints to the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) for professional misconduct.
Doerty referred from the bench to online journalists as “cyber-creeps” despite his own exploitation of children on a political web site. Some journalists have described his portrayal of children as disgusting and despicable. One would think that a queer judge would want to stay away from using children as a vehicle for political ends especially for election as a judge. That sort of political propaganda perpetuates a false pedophile connection. Intelligent queers would avoid giving credence to common misconceptions about homosexuality. They would not wish to perpetuate stereotypes. They would actively try to dispel fallacies. Obviously, Doerty does not possess that sort of intelligence. Statistics show that neither rapists nor pedophiles primarily derive from homosexual communities - Roman Catholic priests, eighteenth-century Parisian Jesuits, characters in Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, and Washington Superior Court judges, notwithstanding.
Doerty deliberately politicized the case by making false claims of homophobia to gain media coverage and maintain the support of the gay people who supported his election. Those plans backfired and his manipulation persuaded the gay community to act in a role supportive of his victim. They found that they had a similar interest in discrimination in housing and landlord abuse on Capital Hill, Seattle. The community distributed posters protesting Doerty’s decision to jail the author and a gay newspaper has requested information for future articles. [Doerty Poster]
Judge Wartnik should know that during the European holocaust Nazis used pink and black triangles on the uniforms of death camp lesbians and gays to designate their "crime" against society. By some reckoning, over 750,000 lesbian and gay people died in Nazi death camps.
Some lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and transgender communities now use those triangles. They wear them with pride to honor those who perished in the same way that many Israelis wear Magen David, the six-pointed star symbol that signifies Judaism. Both minorities know that if they do not act against bigotry, hate, and intolerance, then those signs will again become harbingers of death.
The violence against senior citizens at Council House - seen by some observers as a Nazi/Jewish role reversal - must stop. Judge Wartnik, his wife Lynn, and other directors of both Herzl-Ner Tamid and Council House must account for their behavior and mitigate damage instead of continuing to violate the constitutional rights of their critics.
Both Wartnik and Doerty have done a great disservice to the Seattle gay and Jewish communities by supporting bigotry and abuse of senior citizens. Both communities contain many highly-creative, talented, and intelligent men and women. They should all think twice before contributing to the Wartnik and Doerty political funds or voting for their reelection as judges.
Judge James A. Doerty, Superior Court, State of Washington, issued two anti-harassment orders and contempt citations to censor this forum by prior restraint at the behest of Council House directors and their administrator. Mary Kay Becker, Washington Court of Appeals affirmed them. Washington Supreme Court reversed most of those decisions (30 Mar 06).
[Washington Supreme Court - Decision] [Background Information]
Using their financial power, the directors obtained SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) court orders and contempt citations using perjured testimony against the author of valid exposé. They then had him jailed in solitary confinement.
In this case, SLAPP consists of frivolous charges designed to bankrupt an opponent and create a prior restraint. The landlords have used this tactic on several occasions to try to cover up issues that affect all their tenants.
Doerty thwarted an appeal of his findings for more than five years by withholding court documents and other manipulation. The author/publisher claims judicial bias and arbitrary censorship that deny him his rights under the First Amendment to the US Constitution and Washington State Constitution. Doerty has challenged a principle journalism ethic - seek truth and report it - by denying a reporter’s First Amendment rights. Doerty then wrote biased decisions all without due process of law.
His findings enabled Council House directors to cover up crimes that they and their administrators allegedly committed. A Washington Supreme Court review has allowed the public to know the names of people involved in elder abuse. It will also give an ethical prosecutor an opportunity to consider felony charges of homicide by abuse against Council House directors and their staff. [Homicide by Abuse]
Homicide ranks as a class A felony punishable by a maximum sentence of life imprisonment in a state correctional institution or by a fine of fifty thousand dollars or both. Both the victim’s family and a Council House administrator benefitted financially by allegedly defrauding federal and state agencies prior to death of a resident. [Who Killed Jackie Nations?]
Doerty’s order precluded naming the people involved which forced redaction of copy pending review. Washington Supreme Court reversed the trial court decision which relieves restrictions on publishing details regarding resident deaths and other abuse.
Washington Supreme Court
Council House, Seattle - Summary
Supreme Court Decision #1
Supreme Court Decision #2
Respondents [Mitchell and Council House Inc.]
Appellant Reply [Trummel]
Respondents [Mitchell and Council House Inc.]
Appellant Reply [Trummel]
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
American Society of Journalists and Authors (ASJA)
International Federation of Journalists (IFJ)
National Union of Journalists/London Freelance Branch (NUJ)